<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>uberfoto blog</title>
    <link>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/index/</link>
    <description>somewhat relevant thoughts and ramblings</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>josh@uberfoto.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-10-13T01:10:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Webkit Bug #23364 &#45; Font Smoothing</title>
      <link>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/webkit_bug_23364_-_font_smoothing/</link>
      <guid>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/webkit_bug_23364_-_font_smoothing/#When:01:10:27Z</guid>
      <description>I&#8217;ve created a test page for a bug that&#8217;s been driving me batty for a while. The problem arises when you have relative positioned elements inside of relative positioned elements and animations (apparently when Flash players are embedded on the page too) appearing on the page.

Check it out: http://uberfoto.com/test/anti_alias.php

I&#8217;ve also created another page a while back that shows the issue with a Flash video player embedded on the page. Some bugs with fixed positioning in that sample too&#8230;
http://uberfoto.com/test/flash_problem.php</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-10-13T01:10:27+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Internet Explorer 6 (IE6) Can Suck It</title>
      <link>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/internet_explorer_6_ie6_can_suck_it/</link>
      <guid>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/internet_explorer_6_ie6_can_suck_it/#When:17:43:44Z</guid>
      <description>I&#8217;m done supporting it. In fact, I don&#8217;t even officially support IE7.

So, If you&#8217;re wondering why my site looks broken or funky, update your browser.

I recommend one of the following:</description>
      <dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-10-19T17:43:44+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Aperture 2: Max Supported File Size</title>
      <link>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/aperture_2_max_supported_file_size/</link>
      <guid>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/aperture_2_max_supported_file_size/#When:14:33:06Z</guid>
      <description>Ok, this is totally ridiculous. I found out from an Apple support agent that Aperture currently has a supported file size limit of 250MB. This is why I have been getting the maroon, &#8220;Unsupported Image Format&#8221; error all the time. ...</description>
      <dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-10-19T14:33:06+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Review: MacBook Pro (unibody) &amp;amp; 24&#8221; LED Cinema Display</title>
      <link>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/review_macbook_pro_unibody_24_led_cinema_display/</link>
      <guid>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/review_macbook_pro_unibody_24_led_cinema_display/#When:21:01:53Z</guid>
      <description>I sold my 1st gen MacBook Pro on Craigslist last week and picked up a new facelifted MacBook Pro and a new 24&#8221; LED Cinema Display to go with it.


image copyright Apple</description>
      <dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-12-25T21:01:53+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Review: Nikon D3 and 14&#45;24mm f/2.8</title>
      <link>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/review_nikon_d3_and_14-24mm_f_2.8/</link>
      <guid>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/review_nikon_d3_and_14-24mm_f_2.8/#When:03:07:50Z</guid>
      <description>So, I have been using the D3 and 14&#45;24 since December and have been really impressed.


image copyright DP Review

There are already 9k other sites out there doing D3 reviews so I am going to keep it short. I just wanted to touch on a couple things I really find helpful after using the camera for a few months.</description>
      <dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-18T03:07:50+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Aperture 2: Nikon D3 NEF Support</title>
      <link>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/aperture_2_nikon_d3_nef_support/</link>
      <guid>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/aperture_2_nikon_d3_nef_support/#When:15:08:40Z</guid>
      <description>...is great but has one major issue for me. It is clipping the color detail too early. This means I am getting monochrome shadow areas on my colored subjects and it looks really bad.

Let me expound upon this and give some examples:

Aperture&#8217;s raw conversion for the Nikon D3 is clipping the color from shadows&#8230;. generally. (About 99% of the time.) It is possible that the couple of images I haven&#8217;t seen the problem occur in have color detail just above the clipping threshold.

This really makes for some ugly images. I know, I said that already, but now you can see it for yourself.</description>
      <dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-17T15:08:40+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>New Camera &amp;amp; Gear &#45; Nikon D200 + SB800&#8217;s</title>
      <link>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/new_camera_gear/</link>
      <guid>http://www.uberfoto.com/index.php/uberfoto/blogposts/new_camera_gear/#When:17:44:25Z</guid>
      <description>The D200 came. This camera rocks my face off. I&#8217;ve been shooting with a D70 until now.

My SB&#45;800 strobes came too. These strobes also rock my face off.</description>
      <dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-04-29T17:44:25+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
